Publications

Pages from the Opposition’s Playbook: The EEOC Revises its Compliance Manual

June 19, 2006

If your company has ever had a charge of discrimination filed with the EEOC by an applicant, employee or former employee, the process probably went something like this: you received notice of the charge, were given a few weeks to respond to the charge, and you (or your company attorney) submitted a “position statement” to the EEOC. In your position statement, the company’s story was told, setting forth the reasons why the events at issue were not discriminatory. At that point, an EEOC investigator reviewed the position statement and either dismissed the charge, finding no evidence of discrimination, or took further action, such as the issuance of the dreaded and feared “cause-finding” (in other words, the investigator found cause to believe that your company had engaged in some type of harassing or discriminatory conduct).

If you have ever been through such a situation, you may have asked yourself how the investigators make their decisions. Obviously, part of that comes from a determination of what the employee and employer tell them. But central to their decision are the guidelines set forth in the EEOC Compliance Manual. The Compliance Manual is the EEOC investigator’s Bible. It sets forth rules and regulations to be followed. More importantly, it tells investigators what factors they are to consider when investigating a claim.

Recently, the EEOC revised the provisions of the Compliance Manual relating to race and color discrimination. In this revision, the EEOC sets forth a “non-exhaustive list” of types of evidence that can constitute potential evidence of race discrimination. This list includes:

  • Race-related statements (oral or written) made by decision makers or persons influential to the decision;
  • Comparative treatment evidence, i.e., evidence that similarly situated persons of a different race were treated differently from the charging party;
  • “Relevant background facts.” This catch-all category includes items such as race-related attitudes, the general work environment, and the context of the challenged employment decision;
  • Whether the employer complied with the relevant personnel policies;
  • The race of the decision maker;
  • Statistical evidence; and
  • The credibility of the employer’s explanation.

As the Compliance Manual explains, this list is not exhaustive, and the relevance of particular facts will depend on the nature of the case. However, it is important to consider these factors if your company is faced with a charge of race discrimination, since the investigators will typically find these factors to be the most important factors when analyzing the data before them. This list of factors is also a good benchmark for employers to consider if they are faced with an internal complaint of discrimination and are conducting their own investigation.

Remember, a charge of discrimination is simply the beginning of what can be a process that ends with litigation. As with most legal matters, getting off to a good start is critical, and in the world of employment law, that means obtaining a quick dismissal of the EEOC charge. By taking the Compliance Manual revisions under consideration when dealing with the EEOC, you can increase your chances of a good result at the administrative level. The new manual provisions can be viewed online at www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/race-color.html.

Firm Highlights

Publication

The Tale of OCS and the Coronavirus

How has Opportunity Community Services survived during this pandemic and Phase 1? Rose Kukwa of Opportunity Community Services and Dennis Van Norman with Van Norman & Associates share their experience.  Rose and her team...

Publication

The COVID-19 Vaccine Part 1

Publication

ICHRAs

Individual Coverage HRA. What is it? What are the benefits and drawbacks? What companies are a good fit for ICHRAs versus group health plans? Kevin talks with Matt Hollister, President and CEO of Business...

Publication

The 2020 HR Recap

We’ve made it to the recap episode! The good, the bad, the ugly, and everything in between. Join Kevin and Elaine (Lainey) Luthens as they discuss it all including FFCRA legislation, OSHA, what they...

Experience

COVID-19 Response Team - Resources and Updates

News Item

Thompson Coe Welcomes Partners Kenya Bodden and Patrick Kelly

Publication

The Importance of Strategic Transitions

Transitions versus change, what’s the destination and why is this important for a business?  Kevin talks with Gwen Gierke from Gierke Jungbauer on how they help to manage transitions. Transition happens in three stages: the ending, the neutral zone, and...

Experience

Thompson Coe Saves Client $100Ks in Damages After 3-Day Trial

Publication

Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Laws Under First Amendment’s Religion Clause

Publication

U.S. Supreme Court Settles Issue of Title VII Protections for LGBTQ+ Employees

Headshot of Stephanie Rojo