Front Pay Not Subject to Damage Caps

September 17, 2001

May Title VII plaintiffs obtain awards of front pay which are not subject to the damage caps? The answer is a resounding yes!

The analysis is easiest if we start at the beginning. Since 1964, plaintiffs complaining of sex discrimination have enjoyed remedies including injunction, reinstatement, lost benefits and attorneys fees. However, where a court found an employer's actions of discrimination to be intentional, they were authorized to enjoin those illegal practices by affirmative action, including an award of back pay. In 1972, Congress expanded the Act to authorize any other equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. Immediately after, courts embraced and endorsed awards for front pay. Despite its loose definition, front pay is simply the income a plaintiff would have earned between the time of judgment and reinstatement or money given in lieu of reinstatement.

In 1991 Congress, for the first time, allowed the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages for all intentional discrimination cases in addition to any relief that was already available. However, Congress had the wisdom to limit any award of compensatory and punitive damages by a statutory cap dependent upon the employer's number of employees - with the maximum being $300,000 for employers with 500 or more employees.

If Congress was so clear, why did the U.S. Supreme Court intervene? Sharon Pollard sued E.I. duPont alleging hostile work environment sexual harassment by co-workers with supervisor knowledge. The Tennessee district court awarded Pollard back pay, benefits, attorneys fees and an additional $300,000 in compensatory damages. The court commented that more money should be awarded, but they were precluded from ordering a larger award because front pay was subject to the damage caps. Other federal appellate courts disagreed and were not considering front pay within the confines of the damage cap. The U.S. Supreme Court decided to resolve the conflict. And that they did.

At the end of the day, the Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit and sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings. We cannot give an opinion as to how much more money Pollard will get in the form of front pay. But we can offer this advice - on a hot summer day in Dallas, stay in the shade. And, when you are estimating your exposure in a discrimination case, list front pay as a separate column - not included in the damage cap.

Firm Highlights


The Importance of Strategic Transitions

Transitions versus change, what’s the destination and why is this important for a business?  Kevin talks with Gwen Gierke from Gierke Jungbauer on how they help to manage transitions. Transition happens in three stages: the ending, the neutral zone, and...


U.S. Supreme Court Settles Issue of Title VII Protections for LGBTQ+ Employees

Headshot of Stephanie Rojo

The 2020 HR Recap

We’ve made it to the recap episode! The good, the bad, the ugly, and everything in between. Join Kevin and Elaine (Lainey) Luthens as they discuss it all including FFCRA legislation, OSHA, what they...


Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Laws Under First Amendment’s Religion Clause


COVID-19 Response Team - Resources and Updates


Thompson Coe Saves Client $100Ks in Damages After 3-Day Trial



Individual Coverage HRA. What is it? What are the benefits and drawbacks? What companies are a good fit for ICHRAs versus group health plans? Kevin talks with Matt Hollister, President and CEO of Business...

News Item

Thompson Coe Welcomes Partners Kenya Bodden and Patrick Kelly


The COVID-19 Vaccine Part 1


The Tale of OCS and the Coronavirus

How has Opportunity Community Services survived during this pandemic and Phase 1? Rose Kukwa of Opportunity Community Services and Dennis Van Norman with Van Norman & Associates share their experience.  Rose and her team...