Front Pay Not Subject to Damage Caps

September 17, 2001

May Title VII plaintiffs obtain awards of front pay which are not subject to the damage caps? The answer is a resounding yes!

The analysis is easiest if we start at the beginning. Since 1964, plaintiffs complaining of sex discrimination have enjoyed remedies including injunction, reinstatement, lost benefits and attorneys fees. However, where a court found an employer's actions of discrimination to be intentional, they were authorized to enjoin those illegal practices by affirmative action, including an award of back pay. In 1972, Congress expanded the Act to authorize any other equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. Immediately after, courts embraced and endorsed awards for front pay. Despite its loose definition, front pay is simply the income a plaintiff would have earned between the time of judgment and reinstatement or money given in lieu of reinstatement.

In 1991 Congress, for the first time, allowed the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages for all intentional discrimination cases in addition to any relief that was already available. However, Congress had the wisdom to limit any award of compensatory and punitive damages by a statutory cap dependent upon the employer's number of employees - with the maximum being $300,000 for employers with 500 or more employees.

If Congress was so clear, why did the U.S. Supreme Court intervene? Sharon Pollard sued E.I. duPont alleging hostile work environment sexual harassment by co-workers with supervisor knowledge. The Tennessee district court awarded Pollard back pay, benefits, attorneys fees and an additional $300,000 in compensatory damages. The court commented that more money should be awarded, but they were precluded from ordering a larger award because front pay was subject to the damage caps. Other federal appellate courts disagreed and were not considering front pay within the confines of the damage cap. The U.S. Supreme Court decided to resolve the conflict. And that they did.

At the end of the day, the Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit and sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings. We cannot give an opinion as to how much more money Pollard will get in the form of front pay. But we can offer this advice - on a hot summer day in Dallas, stay in the shade. And, when you are estimating your exposure in a discrimination case, list front pay as a separate column - not included in the damage cap.

Firm Highlights


ADA Accommodations that Come with Fur and a Tail

Boa constrictors in the workplace?  Do we have to accommodate all employee pets?  Join HR attorneys Kevin Mosher and Laura Alaniz for a fun and informative discussion on pets in the workplace.   


Flextime in the Workplace

Is flextime right for your office? How do you keep confidential information confidential when employees are working off site? Listen as Kevin Mosher talks to Bill Kelly, HR Director of Vinco, Inc., about piloting...


Interviewing Tips and Tricks


Fifth Circuit Decision Secured In Civil Rights Case

Dallas partner John Ross, obtained a favorable decision from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of his clients, El Paso Hospital District and two of its nurses, on civil rights, constitutional, and...


The Trifecta: ADA, FMLA, and Workers Compensation

A look into ADA, FMLA, and Workers Compensation from both the HR and Risk Management side. How do they work together? Listen as Kevin and Senior Risk Manager of Patterson Companies, Maggie Hobbs discuss...


Paid Sick and Safe Leave

When you think of Texas do you think of mandatory paid time off laws? How would Paid Sick and Safe Leave affect your HR policies? Join Kevin and Erin McNamara as they discuss this...


Is Sexual Orientation Discrimination Unlawful? Supreme Court to Decide!

Listen to HR attorneys Kevin Mosher and Stephanie Rojo discuss sexual orientation discrimination and transgender discrimination issues and the exciting cases before the Supreme Court.  Will SCOTUS find that federal law protects employees and...