Publications

Compensation is Confidential? Think Twice . . .

April 24, 2014 E-Alerts

On April 8, 2014, President Obama signed an Executive Order, aimed at discouraging employers from adopting workplace policies that discourage employees from freely discussing their compensation with each other.[1] Specifically, the Executive Order prohibits federal contract employers from taking adverse actions (e.g., discipline, termination) against employees/job applicants who discuss their compensation with co-workers/potential co-workers. While the Executive Order—which only applies to federal contract employers—has limited application, the media’s recent discourse on this issue suggests that most people assume employers are otherwise free to prohibit employees from discussing their compensation. This is a myth.

Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) provides all employees the right to “engage in concerted activities,” including the right to discuss their terms and conditions of employment (e.g., compensation) with each other.[2] This right applies to all employees, regardless of whether they are unionized. Under Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA, an employer engages in an unfair labor practice when it denies or limits the Section 7 rights of employees.[3] Based upon these two provisions, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has repeatedly held that employer promulgated policies, which discourage/prohibit employees from discussing their pay and benefits violate the NLRA.

Notably, In re Taylor Made Transp. Servs., Inc., 358 N.L.R.B. 53 (June 7, 2012) serves as a cautionary reminder of the wide array of penalties that may be imposed on employers found to have implemented “gag” policies on compensation dialogue. Here, the employer was found to have violated the NLRA by suspending, and later terminating, an employee for disclosing her wage rate (which was deemed confidential by the employer) to her co-workers. Following this finding, the NLRB imposed the following penalties on the employer: (1) reinstatement of the employee; (2) payment of lost earnings and benefits; (3) removal of information related to the discipline/discharge from employee’s personnel file; (4) rescission of all company policies that precluded employees from discussing compensation; and (5) posting of a Notice, drafted by the NLRB, for 60 days “in conspicuous places” throughout the employer’s facility, which advised of the NLRB’s findings.

Accordingly, while President Obama’s recent Executive Order is not “groundbreaking,” it serves as a reminder that employers would be wise to reexamine and eliminate any policies that could be construed as prohibiting employees from discussing compensation.


[1] Exec. Order No. - -, — C.F.R. — (Apr. 8, 2014), available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/08/executive-order-non-retaliation-disclosure-compensation-information.

[2] 29 U.S.C. § 157.

[3] Id. at § 158(a)(1).

Firm Highlights

Publication

The Tale of OCS and the Coronavirus

How has Opportunity Community Services survived during this pandemic and Phase 1? Rose Kukwa of Opportunity Community Services and Dennis Van Norman with Van Norman & Associates share their experience.  Rose and her team...

News Item

Five Austin Partners Voted As "Top Austin Attorneys 2020"

TopAustinAttorneys
Publication

The 2020 HR Recap

We’ve made it to the recap episode! The good, the bad, the ugly, and everything in between. Join Kevin and Elaine (Lainey) Luthens as they discuss it all including FFCRA legislation, OSHA, what they...

Experience

Thompson Coe Saves Client $100Ks in Damages After 3-Day Trial

Publication

The COVID-19 Vaccine Part 1

Publication

ICHRAs

Individual Coverage HRA. What is it? What are the benefits and drawbacks? What companies are a good fit for ICHRAs versus group health plans? Kevin talks with Matt Hollister, President and CEO of Business...

Experience

COVID-19 Response Team - Resources and Updates

Publication

U.S. Supreme Court Settles Issue of Title VII Protections for LGBTQ+ Employees

Headshot of Stephanie Rojo
Publication

Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Laws Under First Amendment’s Religion Clause

Publication

The Importance of Strategic Transitions

Transitions versus change, what’s the destination and why is this important for a business?  Kevin talks with Gwen Gierke from Gierke Jungbauer on how they help to manage transitions. Transition happens in three stages: the ending, the neutral zone, and...