Firm News

California Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waivers but Finds PAGA Representative Actions Cannot be Waived

June 26, 2014

On Monday, June 23, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, finding that class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable.  However, the Court distinguished actions brought under the Private Attorney General Act (PAGA), which allows an aggrieved employee to bring a civil action on behalf of himself and other current or former employees to recover civil penalties for Labor Code violations, and concluded that such representative actions are not waivable.

In Iskanian, the plaintiff-employee signed an arbitration agreement which stated in part: “EMPLOYEE and COMPANY expressly intend and agree that class action and representative action procedures shall not be asserted, nor will they apply, in any arbitration pursuant to this Policy/Agreement; (2) EMPLOYEE and COMPANY agree that each will not assert class action or representative claims against the other in arbitration or otherwise; and (3) each of EMPLOYEE and COMPANY shall only submit their own, individual claims in arbitration and will not seek to represent the interests of any other person.”

Despite the arbitration agreement, the plaintiff-employee, Iskanian, filed a wage and hour class action against the defendant-employer, CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC.  Iskanian also sought civil penalties for Labor Code violations in a representative capacity under PAGA.  CLS moved to compel arbitration and dismiss the class claims.  Relying on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 US 321, the California Supreme Court upheld the class action waiver, finding that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted a state rule against such waivers.

However, the Court found that the FAA does not preempt state law prohibiting waiver of PAGA representative actions.  The Court reasoned that the PAGA litigant is acting as a “proxy or agent” of the state and prohibition of such waivers would not “frustrate the FAA’s objectives because …the FAA aims to ensure an efficient forum for the resolution of private disputes, whereas a PAGA action is a dispute between an employer and the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency.”

What does this mean for California employers?

Assuming the arbitration agreement is otherwise valid, class action waivers previously thought to be void as against public policy under Gentry v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, will now be enforced by California courts.  Claims under PAGA, however, still cannotbe waived and aggrieved employees are free to seek civil penalties for violations that he or she personally suffered as well as on behalf of all other current or former employees.  PAGA limits the claims for penalties to a one year statute of limitations, but does entitle employees to reasonable attorneys’ fees.  All employers should give due consideration to arbitration agreements with class action waivers.

Firm Highlights


U.S. Supreme Court Settles Issue of Title VII Protections for LGBTQ+ Employees

Headshot of Stephanie Rojo

COVID-19 Response Team - Resources and Updates


Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Laws Under First Amendment’s Religion Clause


Thompson Coe Saves Client $100Ks in Damages After 3-Day Trial


The Tale of OCS and the Coronavirus

How has Opportunity Community Services survived during this pandemic and Phase 1? Rose Kukwa of Opportunity Community Services and Dennis Van Norman with Van Norman & Associates share their experience.  Rose and her team...


The Importance of Strategic Transitions

Transitions versus change, what’s the destination and why is this important for a business?  Kevin talks with Gwen Gierke from Gierke Jungbauer on how they help to manage transitions. Transition happens in three stages: the ending, the neutral zone, and...


The 2020 HR Recap

We’ve made it to the recap episode! The good, the bad, the ugly, and everything in between. Join Kevin and Elaine (Lainey) Luthens as they discuss it all including FFCRA legislation, OSHA, what they...

News Item

Thompson Coe Welcomes Partners Kenya Bodden and Patrick Kelly


The COVID-19 Vaccine Part 1



Individual Coverage HRA. What is it? What are the benefits and drawbacks? What companies are a good fit for ICHRAs versus group health plans? Kevin talks with Matt Hollister, President and CEO of Business...