Site Search
Search
Newsletters

Coverage News

Coverage News: 2009, Issue 1
  • A Duty to Indemnify With No Duty to Defend: D.R. Horton- Texas, Ltd. v. Markel Int’l Ins. Co., Ltd., --- S.W.3d ----, No. 06-1018 (Tex. Dec. 11, 2009)
  • Court Refuses Extrinsic Evidence — Pine Oak Builders, Inc., v. Great American Lloyds Insurance Company, 279 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. 2009)
  • When Mold Attacks—Accidental Discharge Under an HO-B Form: Page v. State Farm Lloyds
  • Texas Supreme Court Addresses Statutory Employer Immunity for General Contractors
  • Fifth Circuit Clarifies the CGL Policy’s Exclusions (j)(5) and (j)(6) and Finds an Insurer Is Bound by a Default Judgment After a Wrongful Denial
  • Prodigy Communications Corp. v. AESIC: The Texas Supreme Court Distinguishes Notice Provisions in Claims-made Policies and Requires a Showing of Prejudice
  • Will Texas Maintain Bad Faith in Worker’s Compensation Claims? Texas Mutual Insurance Company v. Ruttiger
  • Appraise First, Argue Later — Texas Supreme Court Sends Message that Texas Courts Will Not Allow Parties to Circumvent Appraisal Clauses but Will Let Them Argue Coverage Later
  • Insurers Beware: Penalties Accrue When Defense Fees Are Incurred
Coverage News: 2008, Issue 1
  • Mid-Continent Insurance Company V. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
  • No Right of Reimbursement without the Insured's Express Consent
  • Texas Supreme Court Finds Only That Public Policy Does Not Prohibit Coverage for Punitive Damages Under an Employers Liability Policy
  • Fifth Circuit Holds that Punitive Damages Are not Insurable under a CGL Policy
  • "B" Ware! Texas Supreme Court Adopts the Notice-Prejudice Rule for Coverage B
  • Evanstan Insurance Company v. Atofina Petrochemicals, Inc.
Coverage News: Volume 7, Issue 2
  • Texas, A Limited Direct-Action State?
  • Interpleader and Article 542.051: State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Martinez
  • Carriers Argue Excess “Follow Form” Coverages Are not Bound by Primary Insurer’s Policy Interpretation
  • How Could One Sentence Cause Such Controversy?
Coverage News: Volume 7, Issue 1
  • Supreme Court Giveth and The Supreme Court Taketh Away: Pre-Judgment Interest
  • Recoverable On UM Claims But Attorneys Fee Are Not
  • Texas Court of Appeals Adopts Standard for Disqualifying an Expert Witness’ Testimony for Conflict of Interest: Formosa Plastics Corp. v. Kajima International, Inc.
  • Texas Supreme Court Provides Guidance on Both Exemplary Damages and Attorney Fees
  • Texas Supreme Court Considers Questions of Liability Insurer's Duties to Additional Insured
  • Who Does Not Request Defense of Coverage
  • Subrogation's Made Whole Doctrine: Not a Tool For Extracting a Double Recovery
Coverage News: Volume 6, Issue 2
  • The Supreme Court Answers "No" to the Fifth Circuit's Question Regarding Coverage for Mold: Fiess v. State Farm Lloyds
  • Prompt Payment Penalties: Waiting on Pins and Needles
  • Vague Facts as to Date of Occurrence or Damage May Trigger Multiple Policies: Summit Custom Homes v. Great American Lloyds Ins. Co.
  • Recent Developments in Homeowners Insurance
  • Duty to Defend Could Be Triggered by Extrinsic Evidence: GuideOne Elite Ins. Co. v. Fielder Road Baptist Church
  • Thompson Coe Hosts the Sixth Annual Seminar on Texas Insurance Law Developments
Coverage News: Volume 6, Issue 1
  • The Texas Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in the Lamar Homes Case
  • Confidentiality: But At What Cost?
  • “Sufficiently Definite” Contract is Close Enough — Owner Qualifies as Additional Insured
  • The Right to Reimbursement Appears to be Anything But Settled: Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's London
  • Construction Defect Coverage Revisited — With A Twist: Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Company
  • Fifth Circuit Analyzes CGL Auto Use Exclusion: EMCASCO Insurance Company v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance
  • Court of Appeals Finds Insurer Overpaid Claim: Fire Insurance Exchange v. Sullivan
  • Virtual Representation is a Virtual Reality: Texas Supreme Court Weighs in on an Insurer's Right to Intervene in a Liability Lawsuit
  • Congress Extends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act
  • Personal Lines Insurance: Changes in 2006

Labor & Employment News

Labor & Employment News: 2010, Issue 2
  • Break Time Legislated for Nursing Mothers
  • "Only One Bite at the Apple, Please" -- Texas Discrimination Statute Preempts Negligence Claims
  • Avoiding Claims of Unequal Pay
  • Bad News/Good News -- Fifth Circuit Modifies Liability Standard in Retaliation Cases, But Limits Punitive Damage Exposure
  • DOL Opinion: FMLA Leave Available for Nontraditional Parents
Labor & Employment News: 2010, Issue 1
  • U.S. Supreme Court Set to Take on Employee Privacy; Issues in Quon v. Arch Wireless
  • HIPAA Goes "HITECH" - Are You in Compliance?
  • Does Title VII Prohibit Retaliation Based on Associations?
  • Texas Supreme Court Modifies Limitations Period for Discrimination Claims
  • Business Discrimination Claims
  • In Brief...
Labor & Employment News: 2009, Issue 3
  • Supreme Court’s Reversal in Ricci v. Destefano: No Effect on Sonia Sotomayor’s Confirmation, but, Important New Guidance in Resolving Conflicting Theories/Claims of Discrimination
  • Texas Supreme Court Continues to Expand Enforceability of Covenants-Not-To-Compete
  • After Gross: Proof in Age Discrimination Cases
  • Texas Legislature Amends Labor Code Provisions on Disability Laws
Labor & Employment News: 2009, Issue 2
  • Commission's Proposed Rules Implementing Genetic Act of 2008
  • Retaliation Against Participants In An Internal Investigation Prohibited By Title VII
  • Staff Reductions: Avoiding Risks and Potential Pitfalls
  • Fifth Circuit Imposes Limitations on the Use of Offers of Judgment in FLSA Collective Actions 
Labor & Employment News: 2009, Issue 1
  • "Employee Free Forced Choice Act" Moves Front and Center in Congress -- Get Involved Now !!
  • Other Pending Legislation
  • Fifth Circuit Increases the Threat of Punitive Damages in Discrimination Cases
  • Summary Judgments Largely Eliminated under the New ADA Amendments
  • Minnesota Adopts Federal Ellerth-Faragher Standards for Imposing Liability on Employer for Supervisory Sexual Harassment
  • A New Wave of FLSA Claims: Employees Using BlackBerrys from Home for Work-Related Purposes
  • Progressive Disciplinary Policies Need to Be Discretionary
Labor & Employment News: 2008, Issue 3
  • U.S. Supreme Court Holds Employers Bear the Burden of Production and Proof on ADEA RFOA Defense
  • U.S. Congress and President Bush Pass Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
  • A New Wave of FLSA Claims: Employees Using BlackBerrys from Home for Work-Related Purposes
  • Filing a Claim with the EEOC within 300 Days but Outside 180 Days Does not Satisfy the Texas Labor Code
  • Quick Tips
  • Supreme Court Affirms Alternative Retaliation Remedy
  • Electronic Newsletters
  • Save the Date -- Third Annual Labor & Employment Seminar October 1, 2008
Labor & Employment News: 2008, Issue 2
  • Recent Expansions To The Family & Medical Leave Act Cover Military Families
  • Compliance With Overtime And Minimum Wage Requirements: Are Volunteers Really "Volunteers"?
  • FMLA Leave Can Run Concurrently With Workers' Compensation
  • "Me Too" Evidence - At Least It's A Two-Way Street
  • When Is A "Charge" A "Charge"??
Labor & Employment News: 2008, Issue 1
  • No “R-E-S-P-E-C-T” For The NLRB
  • Is Time On Your Side? Courts Rule Timing Along Is Insufficient To Support Retaliation Claims
  • U.S. Supreme Court To Consider What Constitutes A Charge of Discrimination
  • A Victory For Employees Under The FLSA: Attorney's Fees Can Be Recovered Even When The Wages Owned Are Nominal
  • "But It Happened To Me, Too!!!"
  • Quick Tips
Labor & Employment News: Volume 8, Issue 2
  • The "Iceman" Cometh (Maybe)
  • U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies "Original Source" Under The False Claims Act
  • Do You Really Know Your Employees?
  • Is Your Employee "Engaged in Interstate Commerce"?
  • "Free Choice" or Free Elections?
Labor & Employment News: Volume 8, Issue 1
  • Texas Supreme Court Changes Stance on Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements in At-Will Employment
  • New Federal Rules Address “Electronically-Stored Information”
  • NLRB Decision Provides New Guidelines and Expansive Interpretation of “Supervisor” Under the National Labor Relations Act
  • Wage and Hour Retaliation Suits: Calculating Damages For Employees That Make More Money After They Leave
  • The “Reasonableness” of a Neutral Absence Control Policy
  • Employers Speak Out In Frustration Regarding Experiences With The Family And Medical Leave Act

Professional Liability News

Professional Liability News: Volume 2008-01
  • Additional Insured Must Conduct Additional Diligence
  • Recoverable Damages In Legal Malpractice Action
  • Third Party To Insurance Contract Is Bound By Representations Within Four Corners Of Policy
  • Pitfalls Of Electronic Discovery

Legislative News

2011 Life & Health Insurance Legislation in Texas

2011 Property & Casualty Insurance Legislation in Texas

2009 Property & Casualty Insurance Legislation in Texas

2009 Life & Health Insurance Legislation in Texas

2007 Property & Casualty Insurance Legislation in Texas
  • Introduction 
  • Workers’ Compensation Insurance Issues 
  • Auto 
  • Regulatory 
  • Tax 
  • Property
2007 Life & Health Insurance Legislation in Texas
  • Introduction and Overview
  • Regulatory
  • Tax
  • Life
  • Health
  • Conclusions
  • Texas Supreme Court Update
2005 Property & Casualty Insurance Legislation in Texas
  • Introduction
  • Agents
  • Auto
  • Fraud
  • Medical Professional Liability
  • Privacy
  • Property
  • Regulatory
  • Tort Reform
  • Workers Compensation
  • Re-codification
2005 Life & Health Insurance Legislation in Texas
  • Introduction
  • Life Insurance Issues
  • Regulation
  • Privacy
  • Receivership & Financial Regulation
  • Agent Issues
  • Health & Accident Insurance
  • Insurance Fraud Legislation
  • Tort Reform
Media Contact

Natalie Trevino
214-880-2608
ntrevino@thompsoncoe.com